Usually I ignore mission statements because they do not convey any new information. The Botswana Post Office advertises itself: “We deliver”. It is obvious; otherwise I would not go there to post my letters. I go to Cash Build for shopping because they offer the lowest prices. I know it without reading its mission statement. But since I volunteered to be a member of the Justice and Peace Vicariate Committee I have started reading carefully everything published by the Southern African Catholic Bishops’ Conference Justice and Peace Department. Last year each parish received one issue of ‘Justice and Peace annual Report 2001’. The report begins with a mission statement and I was about to skip it, as I had been used to, when out of the corner of my eye I noticed the following statement: “J&P recognizes and promotes the equal dignity of all persons, irrespective of religion, ethnicity, colour, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, origin, economic situation or standard of education”. For the first time a mission statement has caught my attention. I had some doubts about this statement with regard to “sexual orientation”, but I tried to look at it in the way as the Catechism of the Catholic Church says in the paragraph 2357: “They [homosexuals] must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity”. I finished reading and forgot about my doubts. I did not even think I would have to come back to it in the future. A couple of weeks later I was browsing on the Botswana websites and I came across the website of the Botswana Centre for Human Rights Ditshwanelo. The second paragraph of its mission statement looked exactly like the mission statement I had found in the ‘Justice and Peace Annual Report 2001’: “The Centre seeks to affirm human dignity and equality irrespective of (…) sexual orientation”. I would not be surprised if a human rights organization identified itself with the values of the Catholic Church, but Ditshwanelo is not a simple human rights organization. Three years ago Ditshwanelo was awarded the 2000 Felipa Awards by the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) (the organization claims that it is named in honour of Felipa de Souza, a Brazilian lesbian tortured by the Portuguese Inquisition in 1591) for its contribution to promote gay and lesbian’s human rights in Southern Africa. It shows that the idea of recognizing and promoting the equal dignity of all persons irrespective of sexual orientation may be understood in a different way. Basing on Sacred Scripture the tradition of the Catholic Church has always declared that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and homosexual persons are called to chastity (CCC 2359). Was Ditshwanelo awarded for its contribution to promote sexual abstinence among gays and lesbians in Southern Africa? I do not think so. The J&P mission statement looks like the copy of a politically correct form: name, surname, nationality, religion, sex, … and sexual orientation. Putting ‘sexual orientation” together with nationality, religion and sex may be very misleading. Let us have a look at some examples taken only from one issue of the Southern Cross (October 23 to 29, 2002), a Southern Africa’s National Catholic weekly.
|
The letters of the readers to the editor, and there are many of them, show it clearly. One letter was entitled: “Gay parents are better than no parents”. The author of the letter says: “(…) I have seen happy, loving homosexual homes where children are loved and cared for. They are thought respect and are encouraged to lead normal, heterosexual lives. Surly a loving home such as this is far better and more godly than many broken and hurt heterosexual homes”. To my surprise the letter did not have any comment in the catholic newspaper (but other letters have, for instance, “The devotion to the Divine Mercy depends on a reported apparition. Catholics are free to believe or doubts the veracity of this event or similar apparitions, and are not bound by it. (…). Editor”). The Second Vatican Council teaches us that "God himself is the author of marriage” and marriage is understood as the union of love between a man and a woman, a union open to life and integral procreation. Cardinal Trujillo of the Pontifical Council for the Family, commenting on this subject on Vatican Radio said: "To present the union of homosexuals as a kind of value, at the same level as matrimony, is an attack against the truth of man and woman”. In the same issue of The Southern Cross, G. Simmermacher, in his editorial Abandon gay ban plan, suggests to the Vatican not to exclude from the priesthood men with a homosexual orientation. He worries that it could be served as a counter-witness to the teaching of The Catechism of the Catholic Church that: “every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided”. But recently the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments in response to the consultation of a bishop who asked if it is licit to confer priestly ordination to men with manifest homosexual tendencies has expressed its judgment as follows: “Ordination to the deaconate and the priesthood of homosexual men and men with homosexual tendencies is absolutely inadvisable and imprudent and, from the pastoral point of view, very risky. A homosexual person, or one with a homosexual tendency is not, therefore, fit to receive the sacrament of Holy Orders”. These two examples show that Catholics may differ in their views from the official teaching of the Church on certain moral issues. We need, therefore, to have clear and unambiguous statements with regard to homosexuality. The judgments of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments have convinced me of my doubts. We recognize and promote the equal dignity of all persons and there is no doubt about it, but we must bear in mind that homosexual tendency itself is already regarded as objectively disordered (CCC 2358). Putting ‘sexual orientation” next to, for example, “standard of education” may lead some people to the conclusion that being a homosexual is as good as being a doctor or a teacher. There are homosexuals, and we cannot ignore this fact, who did not choose their homosexual condition and for them it is a real trial to fulfil God’s will in their lives. And I doubt that they want to be labelled “gays” in public. What they need is our prayer that they may gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection. Many human rights organizations claim that their mission is to protect the human rights of all people subject to discrimination or abuse based on sexual orientation. Today they are in minority, but both in Greece and in Rome homosexual practices were so common that they had come to be looked on as natural. It is known that many Roman Emperors practiced homosexuality. Nero, for example, took a boy called Sporus and had him castrated. He then married him with a full marriage ceremony and took him home in procession to his palace and lived with him as his wife. When Nero was eliminated and Otho came to the throne, one of the first things he did was to take possession of Sporus. Much later, the Emperor Hadrian's name was associated with a Bithynian youth called Antinous. He lived with him inseparably, and, when he died, he deified him and covered the world with his statues and immortalized his sin by calling a star after him. Although homosexual orientation had been regarded in the eyes of many in Rome as natural, St Paul did not hesitate to write in his letter to the Romans and to the Corinthians warning them that homosexuality, both male and female, was not accepted in the Bible (Rom 1, 24-27; 1 Cor 6,10). Today we must have the same courage to be faithful to the Gospel and not to give in to the pressure of certain dubious human rights organisations. They promote the dignity of all persons including homosexuals, but under the pretence of humans rights they try to present the union of homosexuals as a kind of value at the same level as matrimony that is unacceptable not only from a Christian point of view. Scientific evidence suggests that the 'causes' of homosexuality are complex, but there is no evidence at present to substantiate a biologic theory that homosexual people are “born that way”. However, some anthropologists (C. Brettell, C. Sargent, Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective) point out that sexuality is neither a static state nor a fixed sexual identity or orientation. They argue that human sexuality takes its form through social processes such as religion, ethnicity, class, family as well as reproduction. In Lesotho, for example, schoolgirls have intimate friendship that is called ‘mummy-baby relationship’. It is an institutionalised friendship between younger and older girls and women. These relationships became popular throughout much of black southern Africa starting in the 1950s. The ethnographic data show that these relationships go to the past when women of an earlier generation in rural Lesotho established intimate friendship with other women called ‘special friend”. This special friendship was long term, loving, and erotic relationships that coexisted with heterosexual marriage. Their relationship was celebrated by gift giving, slaughtering a sheep, and feasting that involved the whole community. In Kung society children learn about sex through observation. Boys and girls play at parenthood and marriage. During adolescence, both heterosexual and homosexual sex play is permitted. Some of the best known work exploring homosexuality in Africa is that of Evans-Pritchard and his studies of the Azande of present day Zaire, beginning in the 1920s. Evans-Pritchard found repeated examples of adolescents prior to the age of 17-18 serving as "boy wives" to older men. They were expected to help their "father-in-law" and "mother-in-laws" to cultivate the fields, build huts and would often sleep with their father-in-laws. All these examples show that same-sex sexuality has been noted in a number of indigenous groups in Africa, but this information does not change anything in the Teaching of the Church with regard to homosexuality. The Gospel always comes from “outside” and transmits to the non-Christian cultures its own values and, as John Paul II says in Redemptoris Missio, “at the same time taking the good elements that already exist in them and renewing them from within”. Jesus Christ himself was the greatest original and an outsider to the Jewish people. The Gospel was rejected by the Romans until the time of Constantine the Great (c. AD 274-337), the first Roman ruler who was converted to Christianity, because it was foreign to their system of values and believes. Today we live so many years after the birth of Jesus Christ and Christianity is still stranger to some human rights organisations, indigenous societies and even to some Christians themselves. After reading the J&P mission statement I have a feeling of déjà vu. It reminds me the mission statements of hundreds of human rights organizations in Europe and the United States promoting gay and lesbian’s human rights. All of them are concerned about environmental justice, democratisation, gender equality, even ecumenism, but there is nothing there about building up a just society on the basis of the family. It is lacking also in the J&P mission statement. Let us ask ourselves if it is just to be brought up in a single mother family. Single mothers have become so common, for example, in Botswana that it does not surprise anybody. This is a real problem we are facing in this part of Africa and I cannot understand why it has not been even mentioned in the mission statement of SACBC. The J&P mission statement has left some room for doubts. Mr Simmermacher worries that the exclusion of men with a homosexual orientation from the priesthood may be served as a counter-witness to the teaching of The Catechism of the Catholic Church. I have another worry. I am afraid that the next Filipa Award of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission may be awarded to the Southern African Catholic Bishops’ Conference Justice and Peace Department. February 2003
 .... .... |